75% of parents of children between 5-13 years report that their children learnt less online in comparison to the physical classroom setting. Children attending classes online can suffer from distractions and lower comprehension of class material due to ineffective teaching methods, leading to gaps in knowledge and a loss in motivation. The present research study aims to quantitatively and qualitatively analyse the most effective method of teaching Science online. It further aims to analyse the reasons for the effectiveness of certain methods, to propose improvements and solutions to the current methods employed in the Edtech industry and schools functioning online. The sample group consists of 28 students in Grade 4, from a Public school in Bareilly, India. The study consists of three unique teaching methods, traditional, through drama/storytelling and through arts and crafts, and Science topics aligned with the Class 4 CBSE curriculum. Three 45 minute online classes were conducted with a group of 30 children, followed by a monitored online test and an online survey. The results of this study clearly support that both retention of concepts and engagement within the class is higher in the drama/storytelling and arts and crafts condition as compared to traditional teaching methods. The results of this study can be utilized to improve the effectiveness of science education by Edtech companies and schools and NGOs using online resources.
Published in | Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies (Volume 7, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.tecs.20220703.12 |
Page(s) | 76-88 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Online Education, Science Education, Teaching Pedagogy
[1] | United Nations. (2020, August). Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and Beyond. United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/08/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_and_education_august_2020.pdf. |
[2] | ASER. (2021, February 1). Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) 2020 Wave 1. New Delhi; ASER Centre. http://img.asercentre.org/docs/ASER%202021/ASER%202020%20wave%201%20-%20v2/aser2020wave1report_feb1.pdf. |
[3] | Vyas, A. (2020, September). Status Report- Government and private schools during COVID-19. Oxfam India. https://www.oxfamindia.org/sites/default/files/2020-09/Status%20report%20Government%20and%20private%20schools%20during%20COVID%20-%2019.pdf. |
[4] | SWAYAM. (2022). About SWAYAM. Swayam Central. https://swayam.gov.in/about#:~:text=SWAYAM%20is%20a%20programme%20initiated,all%2C%20including%20the%20most%20disadvantaged. |
[5] | Admin. (2021, December 24). [DIKSHA] Digital Infrastructure for Knowledge Sharing: National Teachers Platform. BYJUS. https://byjus.com/current-affairs/diksha-digital-infrastructure-knowledge-sharing/#:~:text=DIKSHA%20stands%20for%20Digital%20Infrastructure,school%20education%20through%20distance%20mode. |
[6] | Maheshwari, A. (2022, February 12). EdTech: The New Growth Catalyst of Indian Education Industry. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/featurephilia/story/edtech-the-new-growth-catalyst-of-indian-education-industry-1912116-2022-02-12#:~:text=Increase%20in%20EdTech%20industry&text=The%20growth%20spurt%20in%20this,in%20the%20next%2010%20years. |
[7] | Kola, Aina Jacob. (2013). Importance of Science Education to National Development and Problems Militating Against Its Development. American Journal of Educational Research 1. 7: 225-229. http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/1/7/2/# |
[8] | Schwerdt, G., & Wuppermann, A. C. (2010, December 4). Is traditional teaching really all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. Economics of Education Review. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775710001640. |
[9] | Martin, K., & Miller, E. (1988). Storytelling and Science. Language Arts, 65 (3), 255–259. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41411379. |
[10] | Rowcliffe, Stephen. (2004). Storytelling in science. The School science review. 86. 121-125. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252960533_Storytelling_in_science. |
[11] | The Protein Man. (2015). Hands-on Science as a Teaching Advantage [web log]. https://info.gbiosciences.com/blog/hands-on-science-as-a-teaching-advantage. |
[12] | National Academy Press. (1997). Science for all children: A guide to improving science education in your school district. |
[13] | Martin, E. (2021, February 10). Pioneers: Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky. Early Years Educator. https://www.earlyyearseducator.co.uk/features/article/pioneers-jean-piaget-and-lev-vygotsky. |
[14] | Hernik, J., & Jaworska, E. (2018). The effect of enjoyment on learning. INTED Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2018.1087. |
[15] | Gomez, E. A., Wu, D., & Passerini, K. (2010). Computer-supported team-based learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 55 (1), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.003. |
[16] | Thornton, R. K. (1999, January). Using the results of research in science education to improve science learning. In Nicosia, Cyprus: Keynote address to the International Conference on Science Education. |
[17] | Traditional vs. Progressive Education: Benefits and challenges. Traditional vs. Progressive Education | American University. (2021, March 2). Retrieved July 16, 2022, from https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/traditional-vs-progressive-education |
APA Style
Isha Jain. (2022). Exploring Different Pedagogies to Teach Science More Effectively in an Online Environment. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, 7(3), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20220703.12
ACS Style
Isha Jain. Exploring Different Pedagogies to Teach Science More Effectively in an Online Environment. Teach. Educ. Curric. Stud. 2022, 7(3), 76-88. doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20220703.12
@article{10.11648/j.tecs.20220703.12, author = {Isha Jain}, title = {Exploring Different Pedagogies to Teach Science More Effectively in an Online Environment}, journal = {Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies}, volume = {7}, number = {3}, pages = {76-88}, doi = {10.11648/j.tecs.20220703.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20220703.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.tecs.20220703.12}, abstract = {75% of parents of children between 5-13 years report that their children learnt less online in comparison to the physical classroom setting. Children attending classes online can suffer from distractions and lower comprehension of class material due to ineffective teaching methods, leading to gaps in knowledge and a loss in motivation. The present research study aims to quantitatively and qualitatively analyse the most effective method of teaching Science online. It further aims to analyse the reasons for the effectiveness of certain methods, to propose improvements and solutions to the current methods employed in the Edtech industry and schools functioning online. The sample group consists of 28 students in Grade 4, from a Public school in Bareilly, India. The study consists of three unique teaching methods, traditional, through drama/storytelling and through arts and crafts, and Science topics aligned with the Class 4 CBSE curriculum. Three 45 minute online classes were conducted with a group of 30 children, followed by a monitored online test and an online survey. The results of this study clearly support that both retention of concepts and engagement within the class is higher in the drama/storytelling and arts and crafts condition as compared to traditional teaching methods. The results of this study can be utilized to improve the effectiveness of science education by Edtech companies and schools and NGOs using online resources.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Exploring Different Pedagogies to Teach Science More Effectively in an Online Environment AU - Isha Jain Y1 - 2022/07/26 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20220703.12 DO - 10.11648/j.tecs.20220703.12 T2 - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies JF - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies JO - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies SP - 76 EP - 88 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-4971 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20220703.12 AB - 75% of parents of children between 5-13 years report that their children learnt less online in comparison to the physical classroom setting. Children attending classes online can suffer from distractions and lower comprehension of class material due to ineffective teaching methods, leading to gaps in knowledge and a loss in motivation. The present research study aims to quantitatively and qualitatively analyse the most effective method of teaching Science online. It further aims to analyse the reasons for the effectiveness of certain methods, to propose improvements and solutions to the current methods employed in the Edtech industry and schools functioning online. The sample group consists of 28 students in Grade 4, from a Public school in Bareilly, India. The study consists of three unique teaching methods, traditional, through drama/storytelling and through arts and crafts, and Science topics aligned with the Class 4 CBSE curriculum. Three 45 minute online classes were conducted with a group of 30 children, followed by a monitored online test and an online survey. The results of this study clearly support that both retention of concepts and engagement within the class is higher in the drama/storytelling and arts and crafts condition as compared to traditional teaching methods. The results of this study can be utilized to improve the effectiveness of science education by Edtech companies and schools and NGOs using online resources. VL - 7 IS - 3 ER -