Introduction: A single effective therapeutic option for ear keloids has yet to be discovered. Many treatments have been studied with variable effectiveness, side effects and complications. Pressure therapy using custom molded clip is a non-invasive treatment with minimal side effects. In the present study, the recurrence rate of a treatment protocol combining excisional surgery and pressure therapy on ear keloids is being studied in a pediatric population. Materials and Methods: The charts of 22 consecutive patients treated between January 2008 and January 2019 were reviewed. All patients were under 18 years of age and clinically diagnosed with, at least, one keloid of the ear. They all underwent complete surgical excision with primary closure followed by early postoperative pressure therapy using custom molded clips. The collected data included patient age at time of diagnosis and surgery, sex, skin type, familial and personal history, etiology and anatomical location of the keloid, and recurrence. Patients or parents were interviewed by phone call and reviewed by an independent examiner to evaluate the current evolution of their scar (s). Results: 22 patients were included in the study, representing a total of 26 keloids of the ear. The male to female ratio was of 3:4. The mean age at diagnosis was 9.7 years old. The mean follow-up time was 5.2 years. Four ears needed a single corticoid injection in addition to the initial protocol. Follow-up observations showed a recurrence rate of 15.4%. Conclusion: Excisional surgery combined with pressure therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ear keloids in a pediatric population. Although residual symptoms are sometimes observed, it seems to be better tolerated than other, more invasive, therapies.
| Published in | Journal of Surgery (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.js.20210903.12 |
| Page(s) | 103-108 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ear Keloids, Pediatric, Surgical Excision, Pressure Therapy, Recurrence Rate
| [1] | Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J, Mirastschijski U. Skin Wound Healing: An Update on the Current Knowledge and Concepts. Eur Surg Res. 2017; 58 (1–2): 81–94. |
| [2] | Berman B, Maderal A, Raphael B. Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: Pathophysiology, Classification, and Treatment. Dermatol Surg. 2017 Jan; 43: S3-S18. |
| [3] | Lee SS, Yosipovitch G, Chan YH, Goh CL. Pruritus, pain, and small nerve fiber function in keloids: A controlled study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Dec; 51 (6): 1002-6. |
| [4] | Bock O, Schmid-Ott G, Malewski P, Mrowietz U. Quality of life of patients with keloid and hypertrophic scarring. Arch Dermatol Res. 2006 Apr; 297 (10): 433-8. |
| [5] | Lee JY, Yang CC, Chao SC, Wong TW. Histopathological differential diagnosis of keloid and hypertrophic scar. Am J Dermatopathol. 2004 Oct; 26 (5): 379-84. |
| [6] | Andrews JP, Marttala J, Macarak E, Rosenbloom J, Uitto J. Keloids: The paradigm of skin fibrosis – pathomechanisms and treatment. Matrix Biol. 2016 Apr; 51: 37–46. |
| [7] | Alhady SM, Sivanantharajah K. Keloids in various races. A review of 175 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969 Dec; 44 (6): 564–6. |
| [8] | Bayat A, Arscott G, Ollier WE, Grouther DA, Ferguson MW. Keloid disease: clinical relevance of single versus multiple site scars. Br J Plast Surg. 2005 Jan; 58 (1): 28–37. |
| [9] | Butler PD, Longaker MT, Yang GP. Current Progress in Keloid Research and Treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr; 206 (4): 731–41. |
| [10] | Aggarwal A, Ravikumar BC, Vinay KN, Raghukumar S, Yashovardhana DP. A comparative study of various modalities in the treatment of keloids. Int J Dermatol. 2018 Oct; 57 (10): 1192–1200. |
| [11] | Sunaga A, Kamochi H, Sarukawa S, Uda H, Sugawara Y, Asahi R, et al. Reconstitution of Human Keloids in Mouse Skin. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Apr; 5 (4): 1304. |
| [12] | Coentro JQ, Pugliese E, Hanley G, Raghunath M, Zeugolis DI. Current and upcoming therapies to modulate skin scarring and fibrosis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev [Internet]. 2018 Aug 30 [cited 2019 Feb 23]; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169409X18302072. |
| [13] | Niessen FB, Spauwen P, Schalkwijk J, Kon M. On the Nature of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Oct 1; 104 (5): 1435–58. |
| [14] | Rosen DJ, Patel MK, Freeman K, Weiss PR. A Primary Protocol for the Management of Ear Keloids: Results of Excision Combined with Intraoperative and Postoperative Steroid Injections. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Oct; 120 (5): 1395-400. |
| [15] | Ogawa R, Yoshitatsu S, Yoshida K, Miyashita T. Is radiation therapy for keloids acceptable? The risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Oct; 124 (4): 1196–201. |
| [16] | Kadouch DJ, van der Veer WM, Mahdavian Delavary B, Kerkdijk D, Niessen FB. Therapeutic hotline: an alternative adjuvant treatment after ear keloid excision using a custom-made methyl methacrylate stent. Dermatol Ther. 2010 Nov-Dec; 23 (6): 686-92. |
| [17] | Park TH, Seo SW, Kim JK, Chang CH. Outcomes of surgical excision with pressure therapy using magnets and identification of risk factors for recurrent keloids. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Aug; 128 (2): 431-9. |
| [18] | Nason LH. Keloids and their treatment. New Engl J Med. 1942; 226: 883–886. |
| [19] | Tanaydin V, Beugels J, Piatkowski A, Colla C, van den Kerckhove E, Hugenholtz GCG, et al. Efficacy of custom-made pressure clips for ear keloid treatment after surgical excision. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Jan; 69 (1): 115–21. |
| [20] | Lumenta DB, Siepmann E, Kamolz LP. Internet-based survey on current practice for evaluation, prevention, and treatment of scars, hypertrophic scars, and keloids. Wound Repair Regen. 2014 Jul-Aug; 22 (4): 483-91. |
| [21] | Gauglitz GG. Management of keloids and hypertrophic scars: current and emerging options. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Apr 24; 6: 103–14. |
| [22] | Pare A, Johnson T, Spiegel AV. The works of that famous chirurgeon Ambrose Parey translated out of Latin and compared with the French. London: EEBO Editions, ProQuest; 2011. 816 p. |
| [23] | Gauglitz GG, Korting HC, Pavicic T, Ruzicka T, Jeschke MG. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med. 2011 Jan-Feb; 17 (1-2): 113-25. |
| [24] | Savion Y, Sela M, Sharon-Buller A. Pressure earring as an adjunct to surgical removal of earlobe keloids. Dermatol Surg. 2009 Mar; 35 (3): 490-2. |
| [25] | Mustoe TA. Evolution of silicone therapy and mechanism of action in scar management. Aesth Plast Surg. 2008 Jan; 32 (1): 82–92. |
| [26] | Choi J, Lee EH, Park SW, Chang H. Regulation of Transforming Growth Factor β1, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor by Silicone Gel Sheeting in Early-Stage Scarring. Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Jan; 42 (1): 20–7. |
| [27] | Bran GM, Brom J, Hörmann K, Stuck BA. Auricular keloids: combined therapy with a new pressure device. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb; 14 (1): 20–6. |
| [28] | Chalian VA, Bennett JE, Sayoc AM, Ghalichebaf M. Auricular compression stent. J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Oct; 54 (4): 560–3. |
APA Style
Ibrahim Cherry, Tamara Sadighi, Diane Franck. (2021). Combination Between Surgical Excision and Pressure Therapy for Ear Keloids in a Pediatric Population: Clinical Results. Journal of Surgery, 9(3), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20210903.12
ACS Style
Ibrahim Cherry; Tamara Sadighi; Diane Franck. Combination Between Surgical Excision and Pressure Therapy for Ear Keloids in a Pediatric Population: Clinical Results. J. Surg. 2021, 9(3), 103-108. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20210903.12
AMA Style
Ibrahim Cherry, Tamara Sadighi, Diane Franck. Combination Between Surgical Excision and Pressure Therapy for Ear Keloids in a Pediatric Population: Clinical Results. J Surg. 2021;9(3):103-108. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20210903.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.js.20210903.12,
author = {Ibrahim Cherry and Tamara Sadighi and Diane Franck},
title = {Combination Between Surgical Excision and Pressure Therapy for Ear Keloids in a Pediatric Population: Clinical Results},
journal = {Journal of Surgery},
volume = {9},
number = {3},
pages = {103-108},
doi = {10.11648/j.js.20210903.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20210903.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.js.20210903.12},
abstract = {Introduction: A single effective therapeutic option for ear keloids has yet to be discovered. Many treatments have been studied with variable effectiveness, side effects and complications. Pressure therapy using custom molded clip is a non-invasive treatment with minimal side effects. In the present study, the recurrence rate of a treatment protocol combining excisional surgery and pressure therapy on ear keloids is being studied in a pediatric population. Materials and Methods: The charts of 22 consecutive patients treated between January 2008 and January 2019 were reviewed. All patients were under 18 years of age and clinically diagnosed with, at least, one keloid of the ear. They all underwent complete surgical excision with primary closure followed by early postoperative pressure therapy using custom molded clips. The collected data included patient age at time of diagnosis and surgery, sex, skin type, familial and personal history, etiology and anatomical location of the keloid, and recurrence. Patients or parents were interviewed by phone call and reviewed by an independent examiner to evaluate the current evolution of their scar (s). Results: 22 patients were included in the study, representing a total of 26 keloids of the ear. The male to female ratio was of 3:4. The mean age at diagnosis was 9.7 years old. The mean follow-up time was 5.2 years. Four ears needed a single corticoid injection in addition to the initial protocol. Follow-up observations showed a recurrence rate of 15.4%. Conclusion: Excisional surgery combined with pressure therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ear keloids in a pediatric population. Although residual symptoms are sometimes observed, it seems to be better tolerated than other, more invasive, therapies.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Combination Between Surgical Excision and Pressure Therapy for Ear Keloids in a Pediatric Population: Clinical Results AU - Ibrahim Cherry AU - Tamara Sadighi AU - Diane Franck Y1 - 2021/05/08 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20210903.12 DO - 10.11648/j.js.20210903.12 T2 - Journal of Surgery JF - Journal of Surgery JO - Journal of Surgery SP - 103 EP - 108 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0930 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20210903.12 AB - Introduction: A single effective therapeutic option for ear keloids has yet to be discovered. Many treatments have been studied with variable effectiveness, side effects and complications. Pressure therapy using custom molded clip is a non-invasive treatment with minimal side effects. In the present study, the recurrence rate of a treatment protocol combining excisional surgery and pressure therapy on ear keloids is being studied in a pediatric population. Materials and Methods: The charts of 22 consecutive patients treated between January 2008 and January 2019 were reviewed. All patients were under 18 years of age and clinically diagnosed with, at least, one keloid of the ear. They all underwent complete surgical excision with primary closure followed by early postoperative pressure therapy using custom molded clips. The collected data included patient age at time of diagnosis and surgery, sex, skin type, familial and personal history, etiology and anatomical location of the keloid, and recurrence. Patients or parents were interviewed by phone call and reviewed by an independent examiner to evaluate the current evolution of their scar (s). Results: 22 patients were included in the study, representing a total of 26 keloids of the ear. The male to female ratio was of 3:4. The mean age at diagnosis was 9.7 years old. The mean follow-up time was 5.2 years. Four ears needed a single corticoid injection in addition to the initial protocol. Follow-up observations showed a recurrence rate of 15.4%. Conclusion: Excisional surgery combined with pressure therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ear keloids in a pediatric population. Although residual symptoms are sometimes observed, it seems to be better tolerated than other, more invasive, therapies. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -
Email: