This paper examines the relationship of asset price determination via Google data. To capture this relation, I create a model and estimate several time series’ regressions. I use weekly data from 2004 to 2010 from 30 international banks. To my knowledge this is the first study which differentiates between Google’s search volume and Google’s search clicks. I show that asset prices are positively related to the rate of change in Google’s search volume, trading volume and the level of Google search clicks. Secondly, I demonstrate that the absolute level of Google’s search volume and Google’s search clicks behave differently regarding the asset price dynamics. Google’s search volume, which measures long-run searches, is negatively related while Google’s search clicks have a positive relationship to asset prices. Hence, Google’s data offer new insights on both measuring attention and pricing financial assets.
Published in | International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.11 |
Page(s) | 1-7 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Search Data, Asset Price, Asset Bubbles, Google Measures
[1] | S. J. Grossmann and J.E. Stiglizt, "On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets," in American Economic Review, vol. 70, issue 3,1980, pp. 393-408. |
[2] | F. Allen, "The market for information and the origin of financial intermediation," in Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 1, issue 1, 1990, pp. 3-30. |
[3] | L. Cohen and D. Lou, "Complicated Firm," SSRN working paper, AFA 2011 Denver Meetings Paper, no. 1570869, October 2010. |
[4] | D. Duffie, "Presidential Address: Asset Price Dynamics with Slow-Moving Capital," in Journal of Finance, vol. 65, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1237-1267. |
[5] | D. Kahneman, "Attention and Effort," Prentice-Hall,1973. |
[6] | Z. Da, J. Engelberg and P. Gao, "In Search of Attention," in Journal of Finance, vol.66, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1461-1499. |
[7] | B.M. Barber and T. Odeau, "All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors," in Review of Financial Studies, vol. 21(2), 2008, pp. 785-818. |
[8] | X. Li, R.S. Mahani and V. Sandhya, "Does Investor Attention Affect Stock Prices?," SSRN Working Paper, no. 1748851, March 2011. |
[9] | H. Choi and H. Varian, "Predicting the Present with Google Trends," Working Paper, www.google.com/googleblogs/pdfs/google_predicting_the_present.pdf (14.03.2010, 09:37), 2009. |
[10] | R.E. Lucas, "Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy," in Econometrica, vol. 46, issue 6,1978, pp. 1426-1445. |
APA Style
Bodo Herzog. (2013). Google’s Search Data and its Application in Finance. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.11
ACS Style
Bodo Herzog. Google’s Search Data and its Application in Finance. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2013, 2(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.11
AMA Style
Bodo Herzog. Google’s Search Data and its Application in Finance. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2013;2(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.11, author = {Bodo Herzog}, title = {Google’s Search Data and its Application in Finance}, journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, pages = {1-7}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20140201.11}, abstract = {This paper examines the relationship of asset price determination via Google data. To capture this relation, I create a model and estimate several time series’ regressions. I use weekly data from 2004 to 2010 from 30 international banks. To my knowledge this is the first study which differentiates between Google’s search volume and Google’s search clicks. I show that asset prices are positively related to the rate of change in Google’s search volume, trading volume and the level of Google search clicks. Secondly, I demonstrate that the absolute level of Google’s search volume and Google’s search clicks behave differently regarding the asset price dynamics. Google’s search volume, which measures long-run searches, is negatively related while Google’s search clicks have a positive relationship to asset prices. Hence, Google’s data offer new insights on both measuring attention and pricing financial assets.}, year = {2013} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Google’s Search Data and its Application in Finance AU - Bodo Herzog Y1 - 2013/12/10 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.11 T2 - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences JF - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences JO - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences SP - 1 EP - 7 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9561 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.11 AB - This paper examines the relationship of asset price determination via Google data. To capture this relation, I create a model and estimate several time series’ regressions. I use weekly data from 2004 to 2010 from 30 international banks. To my knowledge this is the first study which differentiates between Google’s search volume and Google’s search clicks. I show that asset prices are positively related to the rate of change in Google’s search volume, trading volume and the level of Google search clicks. Secondly, I demonstrate that the absolute level of Google’s search volume and Google’s search clicks behave differently regarding the asset price dynamics. Google’s search volume, which measures long-run searches, is negatively related while Google’s search clicks have a positive relationship to asset prices. Hence, Google’s data offer new insights on both measuring attention and pricing financial assets. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -